Go Back   Pennsylvania Firearm Owners Association Discussion Forum > Discussion > Firearms > Rifles

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old June 13th, 2008
Active Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location:
Forest City, Pennsylvania
(Susquehanna County)
Posts: 119
Rep Power: 1
mchaley is on a distinguished road
Default .308 win vs 7.62x51

It's pretty well known that these are (almost) the same round. I've heard you can use both in a .308 win. I've done some looking around and found that the 7.26x51 is a bit smaller in some dimensions:

7.62x51:
Parent case .300 Savage
Case type Rimless, Bottleneck
Bullet diameter 7.82 mm (0.308 in)
Neck diameter 8.58 mm (0.338 in)
Shoulder diameter 11.35 mm (0.447 in)
Base diameter 11.84 mm (0.466 in)
Rim diameter 11.94 mm (0.470 in)
Rim thickness 1.27 mm (0.050 in)
Case length 51.05 mm (2.010 in)
Overall length 69.85 mm (2.750 in)
Rifling twist 1:12"
Primer type Large Rifle
Maximum pressure 415 MPa (60,200 psi)



.308win
Parent case .300 Savage
Case type Rimless, Bottleneck
Bullet diameter 0.308 in (7.8 mm)
Neck diameter 0.343 in (8.7 mm)
Shoulder diameter 0.454 in (11.5 mm)
Base diameter 0.470 in (11.9 mm)
Rim diameter 0.473 in (12.0 mm)
Rim thickness 0.050 in (1.3 mm)
Case length 2.015 in (51.2 mm)
Overall length 2.800 in (71.1 mm)
Rifling twist 1/12
Primer type Large Rifle
Maximum pressure 62,000 psi (430 MPa)


edit: Bolded the greater dimensions



SO the question:
even though it's off by a small amount, is it still alright to use a 7.62x51 in a .308 win?
__________________
http://www.pandemichosting.com

Last edited by mchaley; June 14th, 2008 at 10:34 AM.
Reply With Quote
Advertisement

Thanks for visiting our forum! If you ever plan to return you should consider quickly registering for a forum account, especially if you're in Pennsylvania. It's simple to do and best of all free. Once registered you'll be able to participate in our discussions and keep up to date on issues important to Pennsylvania firearm owners!

Advertisement - Purchases from this sponsor support PAFOA and second amendment rights in Pennsylvania
  #2 (permalink)  
Old June 13th, 2008
MTechnik's Avatar
Super Member
PAFOA Gold Supporter
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location:
West Chester, Pennsylvania
(Chester County)
Posts: 607
Rep Power: 8
MTechnik is a splendid one to beholdMTechnik is a splendid one to beholdMTechnik is a splendid one to beholdMTechnik is a splendid one to beholdMTechnik is a splendid one to beholdMTechnik is a splendid one to behold
Default Re: .308 win vs 7.62x51

Quote:
Originally Posted by mchaley View Post
It's pretty well known that these are (almost) the same round. I've heard you can use both in a .308 win. I've done some looking around and found that the 7.26x51 is a bit smaller in some dimensions:

SO the question:
even though it's off by a small amount, is it still alright to use a 7.62x51 in a .308 win?
I think the answer is "yes, so long as you aren't reloading"
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old June 13th, 2008
Active Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location:
Forest City, Pennsylvania
(Susquehanna County)
Posts: 119
Rep Power: 1
mchaley is on a distinguished road
Default Re: .308 win vs 7.62x51

So it IS still safe to use both types of ammunition in a .308 win rifle?

Just want to make 100% sure

And what if you were reloading? (I dont plan on it)
__________________
http://www.pandemichosting.com

Last edited by mchaley; June 13th, 2008 at 04:33 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old June 13th, 2008
General Geoff's Avatar
Super Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location:
Allentown, Pennsylvania
(Lehigh County)
Posts: 560
Rep Power: 9
General Geoff is a splendid one to beholdGeneral Geoff is a splendid one to beholdGeneral Geoff is a splendid one to beholdGeneral Geoff is a splendid one to beholdGeneral Geoff is a splendid one to beholdGeneral Geoff is a splendid one to beholdGeneral Geoff is a splendid one to behold
Default Re: .308 win vs 7.62x51

Anything chambered for .308 Winchester will happily eat up any 7.62 ammo.


With a milsurp chambered in 7.62, however, you want to check your headspacing before you shoot a lot of .308 through it. 7.62 go/no-go chamber spec tolerance is really loose, which is fine when using thick 7.62 brass, but might end badly with some thinner .308 brass.
__________________
Any mission, any conditions, any foe at any range.
Twice the mayhem, triple the force.
Ten times the action, total hardcore.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old June 13th, 2008
CoyoteJack's Avatar
Super Member
PAFOA Gold Supporter
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location:
Erie, Pennsylvania
(Erie County)
Posts: 635
Rep Power: 7
CoyoteJack is a glorious beacon of lightCoyoteJack is a glorious beacon of lightCoyoteJack is a glorious beacon of lightCoyoteJack is a glorious beacon of lightCoyoteJack is a glorious beacon of lightCoyoteJack is a glorious beacon of light
Default Re: .308 win vs 7.62x51

The reloading issue as I understand comes from once fired brass actually stretching when the smaller round in shot in the larger chamber. The reloaded brass can then be problematic I suppose.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old June 13th, 2008
Active Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location:
Forest City, Pennsylvania
(Susquehanna County)
Posts: 119
Rep Power: 1
mchaley is on a distinguished road
Default Re: .308 win vs 7.62x51

Quote:
Originally Posted by General Geoff View Post
Anything chambered for .308 Winchester will happily eat up any 7.62 ammo.


With a milsurp chambered in 7.62, however, you want to check your headspacing before you shoot a lot of .308 through it. 7.62 go/no-go chamber spec tolerance is really loose, which is fine when using thick 7.62 brass, but might end badly with some thinner .308 brass.
How would I check headspacing?
__________________
http://www.pandemichosting.com
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old June 14th, 2008
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location:
Coatesville, Pennsylvania
(Chester County)
Posts: 281
Rep Power: 4
skyjerk is a jewel in the roughskyjerk is a jewel in the roughskyjerk is a jewel in the roughskyjerk is a jewel in the rough
Default Re: .308 win vs 7.62x51

Quote:
Originally Posted by CoyoteJack View Post
The reloading issue as I understand comes from once fired brass actually stretching when the smaller round in shot in the larger chamber. The reloaded brass can then be problematic I suppose.
As I understand it, its the 7.62 chamber that may be ever so slightly larger
with regard to headspace, but is the same in other respects.
This would suggest that .308 ammo can be readily used in a 7.62 NATO rifle, but that if you use 7.62 NATO ammo
in a .308 rifle you could have issues because the cartridge could conceivably be too long for the headspace in the chamber.

That said, with regard to firing 7.62 ammo in a .308 rifle I am just parroting what I have heard and have no direct personal experience.

I do know the other way around though.

I have a 7.62 NATO chambered [evil black] rifle (DPMS LR-308C) and I shoot .308 ammo through it all the time.



At least 75% of that .308 ammo is ammo I reloaded myself.

As long as you dont max out the pressure of the loads its fine.
Max pressure loads aren't as accurate anyway so its no loss.

I load 168 grain Sierra BTHP with Hodgdon Varget.
Hogdons data for this bullet/powder combo recommends starting loads at 42 grains and the max at 46 grains.

44 is giving me the best accuracy, I have no pressure problems, and I can
reuse those cases again a few times.
__________________

Last edited by skyjerk; June 14th, 2008 at 09:34 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old June 14th, 2008
Active Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location:
Sterling, Pennsylvania
(Wayne County)
Posts: 193
Rep Power: 2
Qtrborecrazy has a spectacular aura aboutQtrborecrazy has a spectacular aura about
Cool Re: .308 win vs 7.62x51

Warning only use ammo made for your rifle. You will find it stamped right on the barrel for a reason. If your fire forming that is another story. Read owners manual before blowing ones face off. Ask any lawyer.

Qtrborecrazy
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old June 14th, 2008
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location:
Coatesville, Pennsylvania
(Chester County)
Posts: 281
Rep Power: 4
skyjerk is a jewel in the roughskyjerk is a jewel in the roughskyjerk is a jewel in the roughskyjerk is a jewel in the rough
Default Re: .308 win vs 7.62x51

Quote:
Originally Posted by Qtrborecrazy View Post
Warning only use ammo made for your rifle. You will find it stamped right on the barrel for a reason. If your fire forming that is another story. Read owners manual before blowing ones face off. Ask any lawyer.

Qtrborecrazy
DPMS clearly states that you can use any commercially loaded .308 ammo in
their 7.62 NATO chambered rifles.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old June 14th, 2008
Active Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location:
Forest City, Pennsylvania
(Susquehanna County)
Posts: 119
Rep Power: 1
mchaley is on a distinguished road
Default Re: .308 win vs 7.62x51

but not so much a .308 win stamped rifle...
Reason I'm asking is because I might have some 7.62x51 mixed into my ammo pile. Plus if it works - 7.62x51 is usually cheaper.
__________________
http://www.pandemichosting.com
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Looking for 7.62x51 NATO brass Agent Ronin Ammunition & Reloading 16 October 13th, 2008 05:10 PM
WTS: 400 rounds of 7.62x51 in NEPA Jefr00 Accessories & Ammunition 0 June 1st, 2008 07:00 AM
WTB: 308/7.62x51 ammo cursed1 Accessories & Ammunition 1 January 6th, 2008 07:57 PM
S.A. 100 rounds .308 ammo $40.00 7.62x51 44zebra Accessories & Ammunition 1 October 27th, 2007 03:26 PM
WTS 7.62x51 mm/ 308 ammo m1a mags Lougotzz Accessories & Ammunition 1 July 29th, 2007 09:13 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:34 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.