|
Welcome to the Pennsylvania Firearm Owners Association Discussion Forum! You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, chat in our chat room, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, register and join our community today! |
|
|||||||
| Register | Image Hosting | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
| News The news important and relevant to Pennsylvania Firearm Owners. Submit your headlines today! |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
Hi everyone, m new to the forums but Ive been reading on here for a little while now. i read this article and it made me think of a question regarding concealed carry. This man obviously had some pretty accurate feelings regarding what was about to happen to him and im very glad that he reacted the way he did, but my question is would this case stand up to questioning on whether or not it was self defense since the man was never directly met with force? I was under the impression that civilians were only permitted to use deadly force when met with force. could someone clear this up for me?
|
|
||||
|
Quote:
Welcome to the forum.
__________________
Can I help you with your weiner?-GRoPA @ moving day M&P torture test gun. http://pistol-training.com/ 47,618 rounds 2 stoppages, 0 malfunctions, 2 parts breakages |
|
||||
|
If someone is brazen enough to rob you in broad daylight, it's not that far of a stretch to think they may harm you as well. I hope the police, and the courts start to realize that it's not ok to let somone violate you and get away scott free just because they don't physically harm you. I hope I never face a situation like that guy did because I hate courtrooms. I'm also not fond of getting robbed. It's a tough split-second decision and we really don't know how threatening those guys were because we weren't in the victims shoes.
__________________
Can I help you with your weiner?-GRoPA @ moving day M&P torture test gun. http://pistol-training.com/ 47,618 rounds 2 stoppages, 0 malfunctions, 2 parts breakages |
|
|||
|
It is also worth noting the mis-information about LTCF in the comments from the original link.
__________________
SA 1911 TRP, SA XD 9mm and a Ruger Mark III so far... |
|
||||
|
Can someone explain to me what a "sucking chest wound" is. Is it more of a fatal wound?
|
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
|||
|
they call it a "sucking chest wound" because in some cases the wound itself actually makes a sucking noise. basically, since the chest isnt sealed anymore, air can rush through the actual wound when the person inhales. nasty stuff.
|
|
||||
|
Well done. One less scumbag on the streets. I live about five miles from where this happened. It just reinforces why I carry.
__________________
"The right of the citizens to bear arms, in defense of themselves and the state, shall not be questioned." |
|
||||
|
Quote:
Keith PAFOA PROUD!
__________________
A Veteran, whether active duty, retired, national guard, or reserve, is someone who, at one point in his or her life, wrote a blank check made payable to “The United States of America” for an amount of “up to and including my life.” -Stolen from Madcratebuilder at Rugerforum.net |
![]() |
«
Pennsylvania lawsuit tests high court's ruling that lifts D.C. gun ban
|
LTCF shoots man. Ruled Self Defense
»
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:14 PM.








Linear Mode
