|
Welcome to the Pennsylvania Firearm Owners Association Discussion Forum! You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, chat in our chat room, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, register and join our community today! |
|
|||||||
| Register | Image Hosting | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
| The Lounge Everything off-topic. You can post anything here that doesn't fit elsewhere as long as it's legal. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
yes, but, if you completely take away the civil avenue of pursuit and rely only on the criminal avenue of pursuit, your only remaining avenue of pursuit relies on the government to prosecute itself. that generally only happens if doing so happens to fit in with the agenda of at least one of the government officials (LEOs, DAs, and judges) involved.
if they are all anti...and you cannot pursue the matter in civil court...you are SOL. |
|
||||
|
Quote:
Not disagreeing with you at all, whether or not the avenue is valid or of any real use to the common person isn't my point, only that it's there, and that's why people will support this one...just like a lot of other laws (DV laws, Mental health laws etc...). It's crap, but that's what people are gonna think when they read about it...they won't see the potential for abuse. I agree it's there in some fashion, but we're really just guessing as to the capacity for abuse that actually exists.
__________________
By my own admission and some other crap I don't believe in, I am a lying, thieving, blasphemous, murderous, adulterer at heart." Can I have some money to save my soul, or at least to buy beer and condoms to bring to Dis?
|
|
|||
|
Lets say you've got a tan going this week and your local pharmacy reports you when you go get photos of yourself at the range developed, now you get fired for missing work because you were in FBI interrogation all of Tuesday. do you want them to be immune from a lawsuit?
|
|
|||
|
Quote:
...but our own federal government instructs us:Quote:
|
|
||||
|
As I see it the probelem is not that you will lose the case, assuming it was a reasonable call, but that you are out so much money if you lose. The solution for any frivilous lawsuite, not just the Imams, is to make the loser pay the court costs of the winner.
Also, raise the requirement for a guilty verdict to "beyond reasonable doubt". You can guess I am no lawyer. ![]() |
![]() |
«
shot a milk jug
|
Gun pr0n!
»
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:03 PM.









...but our own federal government instructs us:
Linear Mode
