|
|||||||
| Notices |
| Gun Pictures Want to show off your new toy? Want to request a picture of something specific? Upload your pictures here! |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
Advertisement
|
|
Thanks for visiting our forum! If you ever plan to return you should consider quickly registering for a forum account, especially if you're in Pennsylvania. It's simple to do and best of all free. Once registered you'll be able to participate in our discussions and keep up to date on issues important to Pennsylvania firearm owners! |
|
Advertisement - Purchases from this sponsor support PAFOA and second amendment rights in Pennsylvania
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Did you contact Aim about the problem? They have a good reputation for service, perhaps you could give it a try.
__________________
We sleep soundly in our beds because rough men stand ready in the night to visit violence on those who would do us harm. George Orwell |
|
|||
|
Yes I messaged their customer service, and am awaiting their response. I will keep this thread updated when I hear back, as you said this company has a good reputation and it is not my intention to damage it. I only want to inform people what to expect if they are considering ordering this particular surplus item.
|
|
|||
|
Another issue with the feeding is that the magazine holds the rounds seated so far back in the receiver that the bolt does not go back far enough to load the next round. Maybe this is a problem with the magazine lips that could be fixed with some pliers? I attached a pic in hopes that one of you Enfield experts could tell me which way I need to bend the feed lips to get this thing closer to running? Help!!
![]()
|
|
|||
|
Me again, one reason the bolt does not go back far enough to feed the next round is that the retaining spring is loose and flapping back and forth, sometimes blocking the bolt from coming back the last few millimeters. I am guessing this is not normal?
|
|
||||
|
Quote:
Do not alter the magazine - yet! ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ I can tell just from this picture that the problem is being caused not by the magazine, but by restricted bolt travel. If the bolt in this photo is as far back as it'll go, something's blocking it. If you'll notice, the stripper clip groove isn't clear, so obviously the bolt needs to go back more. That said, I wouldn't be surprised to hear you can't get the bolt out, either. Find the root cause of this, and it'll probably run okay. My old 2A was in worse shape than yours, and it shot very well. It also had two grooves in the feed ramp, although they looked like they were intentionally machined there. I polished it, along with the bolt face and it fed ammo as smooth as glass.
__________________
Gloria: "65 percent of the people murdered in the last 10 years were killed by hand guns" Archie Bunker: "would it make you feel better, little girl, if they was pushed outta windows?" http://www.moviewavs.com/TV_Shows/Al...he_Family.html |
|
||||
|
I got one a few months back when they were on sale for $99. Haven't shot it yet, but it appears to be functional.
Vince
__________________
www.bloomautomatic.com - Golf Ball Launchers for AR-15, SKS, FAL, and many others www.bloomautomatic.com/lbsc - Long Branch Sportsman's Club, Long Branch, PA |
|
|||
|
PA Rifleman had the right of it, the bolt travel was being restricted by just a few millimeters due to the loose retaining spring. After removing the forestock and tightening the screw that holds the retaining spring and sear, the bolt travels the full distance, so that problem is solved.
Now my problem is that one round in 5 will feed out of the magazine at too sharp of an angle and the tip will jam into the top of the chamber. As you can see in the pictures I am using boattail hollow-point .308 rounds, however, which may be the problem as this rifle was designed for FMJ ammo. The front magazine feed lips may do a better job guiding standard ball ammunition, I will post here again with results after I pick some up. |
|
|||
|
Remember that this rifle is designed for the 7.62*51 nato and not .308 winchester. Both are dimensionally pretty much the same but the power levels are not. This rifle was redesigned and built with better steel than the original .303 brit rifles, but I would be careful firing commerical .308 rounds in the rifle.
This gun was altered off a a design from the turn of the last century. and a cartridge that was rimmed. It did solve the problem caliber conversion, but I would not call it perfect or totally foolproof. I'm not trying to bash the rifle but it was built as a battle rifle. Its rough around the edges but it works. I love the Lee Enfield design and find it to be kinda pretty. |
|
||||
|
Quote:
More info: http://www.thegunzone.com/30cal.html http://www.smellysmleshooters.net/ammopressure.htm http://www.fulton-armory.com/308.htm http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delta_L_problem
__________________
Gloria: "65 percent of the people murdered in the last 10 years were killed by hand guns" Archie Bunker: "would it make you feel better, little girl, if they was pushed outta windows?" http://www.moviewavs.com/TV_Shows/Al...he_Family.html |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| WTS Enfield no4 mk1 303 | pred | Classifieds Archive | 0 | June 21st, 2008 12:21 PM |
| WTS: Ishapore Lee Enfield, 760 rds 7.62NATO | St Michael | Classifieds Archive | 1 | April 22nd, 2008 12:01 AM |
| Lee-Enfield 303 Help | Holleta | Rifles | 14 | August 7th, 2007 08:00 PM |
| WTS/WTT: FTF (PA) Enfield #4mk1, Enfield #1mk3, 91/30mosin 1938 | crowsnest2002 | Classifieds Archive | 8 | July 12th, 2007 02:14 PM |
| WTS Ishapore Enfield 2A1 7.62mm + bayonet $199.99-WC area | PA Rifleman | Classifieds Archive | 0 | February 3rd, 2007 03:36 PM |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:26 PM.















Linear Mode

