"The right of the citizens to bear arms in defense of themselves and the State shall not be questioned." - Pennsylvania Constitution, Article 1, Section 21
|
|||||||
| Notices |
| General General firearm-related talk that does not fit into any of the other forums. |
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
October 8th, 2008
|
|||
|
|||
Boston Legal episode about "guns"...
Ok, even if you're not a fan or regular viewer of the show I just have to say it was a good show. It aired last night but you can view it on ABC's website. I am sure there were some flaws in it but it was quite amusing and obviously the writers are not antis in the least. (knew this before though as one of the main characters is always running around sporting guns...he's a little too "free" with them though which saddens me) Just wanted to mention it....it's worth the time to watch IMO if anyone is looking for something to do...check it out.
|
|
Advertisement
|
|
Thanks for visiting our forum! If you ever plan to return you should consider quickly registering for a forum account, especially if you're in Pennsylvania. It's simple to do and best of all free. Once registered you'll be able to participate in our discussions and keep up to date on issues important to Pennsylvania firearm owners! |
|
Advertisement - Purchases from this sponsor support PAFOA and second amendment rights in Pennsylvania
|
|
|
|
October 8th, 2008
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Boston Legal episode about "guns"...
I saw it. Well, the first 5 minutes or so.
Do you mean the one where Shatner's character popped the mugger in the knee and both feet? Yeah, I don't think I'd call that "pro-gun writing". More like, "See, those gun people ARE nuts!" (This was emphasized even more when the police came to arrest him for unlicensed carry, and he/they remover a half dozen handguns from his person.) But then, I don't watch regularly, so maybe I don't have a handle on how they write the show.
__________________
OK, I got my lever gun! THANKS to those who were keeping an eye out for me! Here she is!
|
|
October 8th, 2008
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Boston Legal episode about "guns"...
Well...you missed the closing argument...because he was charged with carrying without his concealed carry license....guy whipped out a copy of the bill of rights and crossed out the beginning and circled the part about how the right to bear arms shall not be infringed upon. He went off about how they just want to apply this and that to other stuff but when it comes to guns igore it or pretend it doesn't exist etc.
|
|
October 8th, 2008
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Boston Legal episode about "guns"...
I love his character on that show.
William Shatner for President http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=71Oo-BjKzCE
__________________
"For those who understand, no explanation is necessary and for those who do not understand, no explanation is possible." -unknown
|
|
| Bookmarks |
«
Illegal To Use Nonlethal Self-Defense If You Can Safely Retreat?
|
What If The Dems win and the worst happens????
»
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
Linear Mode
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| "Unique law lets police seize guns before a crime is committed " | Damage control | National | 6 | August 11th, 2008 09:34 PM |
| How many carry a "stun gun" and are they legal? | sgser | Question & Answer | 13 | July 28th, 2008 05:54 AM |
| "legal carrying of guns will turn the streets into the wild west" | General Geoff | Concealed & Open Carry | 4 | April 19th, 2008 11:44 AM |
| PAFOA "Legal Section" | mjf | Support & Suggestions | 6 | January 18th, 2008 05:45 PM |
| NFRTR "questionable" in legal proceedings | SigForLife | NFA/Class 3/Title II | 0 | December 15th, 2007 10:00 AM |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:37 AM.