|
Welcome to the Pennsylvania Firearm Owners Association Discussion Forum! You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, chat in our chat room, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, register and join our community today! |
|
|||||||
| Register | Image Hosting | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
| Concealed & Open Carry Discuss all aspects of carrying firearms here. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
||||
|
Perhaps to the listed e-mail address for the author of the article? (included in the OP)
__________________
GunTruth (my blog) - - - Member: PAFOA, FOAC, NRA - - - Info and links to documents from my revocation and appeal. |
|
|||
|
Quote:
Sorry for the confusion but I promise it won't take me long to get the hang of this. ![]()
__________________
"I don't like repeat offenders. I like dead offenders." Ted Nugent |
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
GunTruth (my blog) - - - Member: PAFOA, FOAC, NRA - - - Info and links to documents from my revocation and appeal. |
|
||||
|
Translation: "I supported OC until someone actually did it"
Another problem with the chief's comments... If he knew OC was legal, why were his officers 1) telling mystery_man it was not legal. 2) threatening mystery_man verbally and physically 3) detaining him 4) confiscating his firearm 5) refusing to give him the incident report? 6) Why were his officers giving me dirty looks hateful stares when I accompanied mystery_man when he picked up his gun they illegally confiscated? ??? As for the "causing discomfort" statement. The only thing that proves is that he knows virtually nothing about what really happened in Dickson City. No, chief, the only people "uncomfortable" with OC are the ones doing it when they are illegally harassed by LEOs. He's also jumped on the bandwagon of accusing people who OC of doing something "wrong". Sorry, Chief Dessoye. Many of us have been OC'ing for years with nary a problem save until some over zealous LEO in Dicksn City and Wilkes-Barre decided to push their authority beyond the scope of the law. Since some people are "uncomfortable" seeing black people shouldn't the chief be lobbying for a law against that too? I think I'm going to fwd this article to Sue Henry and tell her I would gladly debate Chief Dessoye on the air if she cares to set it up.
__________________
Quote:
http://www.pafoa.org/forum/lounge-10...can-3-buy.html Last edited by Pa. Patriot : July 23rd, 2008 at 08:54 PM. |
|
|||
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
|||
|
good luck revisiting the PA declaration of rights, there chief.
oh, and anything that requires a license is, by definition, not legally considered a right...so, really, the chief supports the privelege of most people to bear arms but does not support the right of anyone to bear arms. |
|
||||
|
I don't think he means this: ![]() Noah |
|
||||
|
"I am also a realist. The general public is uncomfortable seeing people with a gun strapped to their hip in public," he said.
This is just a old go to saying. Like the one used at the dc town meeting. It is against the community standard.
__________________
|
|
||||
|
Quote:
"Evolving standards of decency must embrace and ex- press respect for the dignity of the person, and the pun- ishment of criminals must conform to that rule" From Kennedy v.s. Louisiana |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:32 PM.














Linear Mode
